The Reformation doctrine makes a deliberate and systematic distinction between justification on the one hand and sanctification or regeneration on the other hand.Anthony N.S. Lane, Justification by Faith in Catholic-Protestant Dialogue: An Evangelical Assessment, p. 18.The Reformers were careful to distinguish these two--but not to separate them. One cannot have one without the other--as with the heat and light of the sun. The sun gives out heat and light. These two cannot be separated. When the sun shines there is both heat and light; yet they are distinct and not to be confused. We are not warmed by the sun's light nor illumined by its heat. To use a modern illustration, justification and sanctification are like the two legs of a pair of trousers, not like two socks which may well become separated and, in the author's experience, too often do become separated.
- Justification refers to my status; sanctification to my state.
- Justification is about God's attitude to me changing; sanctification is about God changing me.
- Justification is about how God looks on me; sanctification is about what he does in me.
- Justification is about Christ dying for my sins on the cross; sanctification is about Christ at work in me by the Holy Spirit changing my life.
Showing posts with label justification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justification. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
The Difference between Justification and Sanctification
Tony Lane:
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
"The Sufficiency of Christ's Obedience in His Life and Death"
John Piper has written a new article on Christ's obedience and our justification.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
O Sweet Exchange!
John Beckman passes along this good early quote (about AD 130) on Christ's righteousness in justification:
(ANF1, Epistle to Diognetus, chapt. 9, p. 28)
He himself took on Him the burden of our iniquities, He gave His own Son as a ransom for us, the holy One for transgressors, the blameless One for the wicked, the righteous One for the unrighteous, the incorruptible One for the corruptible, the immortal One for them that are mortal. For what other thing was capable of covering our sins than His righteousness? By what other one was it possible that we, the wicked and ungodly, could be justified, than by the only Son of God? O sweet exchange! O unsearchable operation! O benefits surpassing all expectation! that the wickedness of many should be hid in a single righteous One, and that the righteousness of One should justify many transgressors!
(ANF1, Epistle to Diognetus, chapt. 9, p. 28)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)