I posted a question on the elders' blog at
It’s been subtle, but there’s been a theme running through the book that one might describe as the gloating of science over theology. There are statements along the lines of, “They could hope in God, but it was science that would save their lives.” Not exactly that, but that’s the idea. One of the most obvious examples of this is that the old practice of “heroic medicine”—epitomized by the belief that disease was an imbalance in the body’s humors that could be remedied by purging, especially bleeding—is ridiculed, blamed for thousands of deaths, and . . . attributed to belief in God.
All of this essentially comes down to the old argument, “Look, science has cured disease, tamed electricity, put airplanes in the sky, made iPODS possible. And theology? What has theology ever done for humanity?” I imagine we could all make the very sound argument that science never would have developed without Christianity, but what about that other question? What has theology done for humanity? Can it even begin to compete with science on that playing field?
Gg