Between Two Worlds: A Mix of Theology, Philosophy, Politics, and Culture



Saturday, June 24, 2006

A Biblical Model of Giving

7 comments | Permalink
In these two articles (published in the Bulletin of Biblical Research) Andreas Kostenberger and David Croteau provide an extensive examination of whether Christians are obligated to tithe--that is, given ten percent of their income--under the new covenant. They conclude that "the view that Christians are required to give at least ten percent of their income lacks adequate support from the biblical data. This is not to say that Christians are not required to give, but that no Scripture commands a certain percentage as the minimum giving requirement."

I find their exegetical arguments persuasive. Unfortunately, some people resist such an examination for they infer that this is motivated by a desire to give less, or at least will result in less giving in the church. The authors plead "not guilty" to the first charge, and even suggest that perhaps giving would increase if the arguments were more biblical.

They go on to survey the NT perspective on giving and suggest that our giving should be...
  • Systematic: Give on a regular basis, that is, weekly, bi-monthly, monthly, etc. (1 Cor. 16:1).
  • Proportional: Give as you have been prospered; according to your ability (1 Cor 16:2;
  • 2 Cor 8:2–3)
  • Sacrificial/generous: Give generously, even sacrificially, but not to the point of personal affliction (2 Cor 8:2–3;Phil 4:17–18)
  • Intentional: Give deliberately in order to meet a genuine need, not out of guilt merely to soothe a pressing request (2 Cor 8:4; Phil 4:16)
  • Properly motivated: Our motivation for giving should be love for others (2 Cor. 8:9), a desire for reciprocity (1 Cor 9:14–15; 2 Cor 8:12–14; cf. Gal 6:6), and an eye to the reward from God (2 Cor 9:6)
  • Cheerful: God loves a cheerful giver (2 Cor 9:7)
  • Voluntary: Giving ought to be done out of one’s free volition (2 Cor 8:2–3, 8; 9:7; Phil 4:18)
Finally, they offer the following quotes, which I pass along for your consideration:

Craig Blomberg: “[t]he standard Paul exhorts us to follow is actually a more stringent one than the traditional tithe. If most affluent Western Christians were to be honest about the extent of their surplus, they would give considerably higher than 10% to Christian causes.”

Walter Kaiser: “if a tenth was the minimal amount under the Law, how can Christians do any less? Perhaps we should consider not how little but how much we can give, seeing how richly blessed we are in Christ.”

7 Comments:

Anonymous Brian Shaughnessy said...

Good area for discussion. One thing my wife and I have struggled with is how, or to whom, giving should be directed. Certainly we ought to be regular supporters of our local church. But there are times when God puts a special burden on our hearts for a concern not addressed through our church, or not addressed to the degree we would like. Is it right if some of those burdens result in a shift in giving away from the local church? Not a complete shift, but a partial shift? In my mind, our commitment to supporting the local church is no less, even if the dollar amount given may be. It's simply a matter of responding to the burdens and concerns for the church universal that God has placed on our hearts. Anyway, it's something we continue to work through.

6/25/2006 08:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Alex Chediak said...

Brian,

One approach is to, perhaps at the beginning of a year, budget a percentage of giving towards your local church and a percentage for "other" (individual missionaries, organizations, needs you become aware of). This allows both discipline and systematic giving, combined with flexibility to meet needs which inevitably arise.

6/25/2006 08:27:00 AM  
Blogger Wayne Shih said...

One of the points was to give sacrificially, "but not to the point of personal affliction." Maybe I don't have any right to say anything about this point, since I live in a land of plenty and I don't know that I have ever lacked for anything. But why should sacrificial giving not be to the point of personal affliction? The Macedonians gave both cheerfully and beyond their means. Is it possible to give to the point of joyful affliction?

6/26/2006 10:40:00 AM  
Blogger Todd Leroy said...

This this kind of teaching is so important in a poverty culture. My wife and I are missionaries in a developing country with 37.5% unemployment. The preachers are robbing and starving God's people with their commands to tithe. It's actually sickening and once we got here and looked for resources on this issue, it was sad to not find any mention of it in any of our systematic theology books and almost nothing online--at least not any sound Biblical treatment. I've been working on my own treatment of the issue for a couple of months and will distribute a pamphlet locally soon.

6/29/2006 06:28:00 AM  
Blogger dacroteau said...

Wayne, the reason I believe we shouldn't give to the point of personal affliction is because Paul says so in 2 Corinthians 8:13 ... look especially at the excellent translation of the NLT. What this means is that we shouldn't give so much that the church needs to take up an offering for us because of our financial struggles.

6/29/2006 11:35:00 PM  
Blogger Robin said...

Each church has an obligation to support its pastor. (1 Timothy 5:18) Therefore I think the full tithe should go to your local church. I find Craigs comment about 'Christian causes' a little too ambiguous for my taste. In my opinion para-church organizations, generally speaking, are subject to less accountability than the local church (elders, etc.)

This may seem insensitive but as for Todd's comment about 'poverty cultures' I would respond that the tithe seems to be perfectly suited to such a situation. Tithing is proportional to what the Lord has given to you. I don't see how preachers are robbing people if they teach the bibical concept of tithing. Of course I think it would be shameful if preachers in poverty cultures lived at a much higher standard of living than their flock! I know of some local churches in poorer countries who never learn to biblically support their own pastors, prefering to rely on 'rich' Americans - I find that equally shameful!

7/03/2006 08:32:00 PM  
Blogger Dr Russ said...

It is about time that a reputable publication had the nerve to question tithing. As late as 1925 the SBC Faith and Message did not even contain a text under Stewardship. It took over 300 years from 1649 to 1963 merely to add texts.

Kaiser repeats the false assumption that every OT Israelite was required to give 10%. Actually only farmers and herdsmen met the narrow definition while craftsmen and tradesmen were not required to tithe. Only God's land could give the increase.

Robin's reference to 1 Timothy 5:18 ignores its context of 1-17 which is a discussion of discipline. Elders ere to be disciplined with "double honor" or "caution." Why would Paul tell Timothy to take a double wage when he refused any (1 Cor 9:15-19; Acts 20:29-35)?

Also, the "whole tithe" never went to the priests. It went to the Levites who were only servants to the priests and also served the kings as political officials. Priests received one tenth of the whole tithe from the Levites. (Num 18:20-29; Neh. 10:35-38).

Todd, I invite you and everybody else to check out my web site and book on tithing which is an expansion of my Ph. D. dissertation. You may also join our discussion group. www.shouldthechurchteachtithing.com

7/14/2006 09:26:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home