Pierced for Our Transgressions
18 comments | Permalink
IVP-UK is set to publish a landmark work: Pierced for Our Transgressions: Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution. (Clicking on the link will take you to a website for the book. You can also order it from Amazon.com/uk--it is due out in mid-March.)The authors of the book are Mike Ovey, Steve Jeffery, and Andrew Sach. Dr. Ovey will be replacing David Peterson as principal of Oak Hill College in the UK.
You can read online the table of contents and the foreword by John Piper.
I'll be sure to let you know when the book has been picked up in North America--which publisher and when it will come out.
Here are just some of the endorsements the book has received:
This book is important not only because it deals so competently with what lies at the heart of Christ's cross work, but because it responds effectively to a new generation of people who are not listening very carefully to what either Scripture or history says. One of the delightful features of this book is reflected in the subtitle: the authors make no apology for their thesis, but underscore the glory of penal substitution. This book deserves the widespread circulation achieved by corresponding contributions a generation ago - the contributions of Leon Morris, Jim Packer, and John Stott.(HT: Dave Bish)D. A. Carson, Research Professor of New Testament, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, Illinois
The Bible historically has been understood to teach explicitly and implicitly that Christ died as a penal substitute for sinners. That’s what this excellent volume teaches us, too. Carefully studying the primary biblical texts and then answering numerous objections, this book explains and defends the understanding that Christ died in our place, taking our penalty for us. From the biblical material to patristic quotations, from pastoral implications to present objections, this book is a responsible and comprehensive introduction. All the authors’ careful work promises to make this book the new standard text on Christ’s atoning work. Now, I can’t wait to read it again, devotionally.
Mark Dever, Pastor, Capitol Hill Baptist Church
This extended declaration and defence of the penal substitutionary view of Christ’s atoning death responds to a plethora of current criticisms, many of them in-house, with a thoroughness and effectiveness that is without parallel anywhere. The book’s existence shows that a British evangelical theology which exegetically, systematically, apologetically and pastorally can take on the world is in process of coming to birth. I hail this treatise as an epoch-making tour de force, and hopefully a sign of many more good things to come.
J. I. Packer, Professor of Theology, Regent College, Vancouver
Atonement is the central doctrine of the Christian faith, and penal substitution is the heart of this doctrine. It is wonderful to have a whole book on penal substitution.
Roger Nicole, Professor of Theology, Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando, Florida
A person’s attitude to the cross tells you much about their theology as a whole, as it is on Calvary that we see the divine response to the human predicament. Thus, the perennial attempts throughout church history to relativize and even deny the propitiatory and substitutionary nature of Christ’s sacrifice should not simply be understood as peripheral discussions; they indicate a constant tendency to revise the very essence of the Christian faith to conform to wider cultural mores and shibboleths. It is thus a great pleasure to commend a book such as this, which seeks to defend a biblical, orthodox understanding of the atonement and to reinforce the non-negotiable centrality of God’s wrath against sin and merciful grace towards humanity. Careful readers will find much here that will enable them to articulate with clarity and conviction this important gospel doctrine.
Carl R. Trueman, Professor of Historical Theology and Church History, Dean of Faculty, Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The doctrine of penal substitution is often maligned and misunderstood today. Pierced for our Transgressions is the perfect antidote. The authors defend the doctrine with sparkling clarity and winsome logic. I thank God for this work in which penal substitution is biblically grounded, theologically articulated, and historically vindicated. Nor could one object that the authors fail to consider alternative views. Every objection to penal substitution is considered and refuted. In this book we are summoned again to the heart of the gospel.
Thomas R. Schreiner, James Buchanan Harrison Professor of New Testament, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky
Pierced for our Transgressions is a treasure-trove of information and analysis on the important, yet disputed doctrine of penal substitution. As a biblical scholar, I enthusiastically commend the authors for their careful exegesis of the biblical text. From this point on, critics of the biblical teaching must interact with the arguments of this book. Further, every Christian, whether aware of the debate or not, can greatly benefit from this comprehensive and penetrating treatment of this crucial doctrine.
Tremper Longman III, Robert H. Gundry Professor of Biblical Studies, Westmont College, Santa Barbara, California
A well-thumbed copy of Pierced for Our Transgressions ought to rest on the bookshelf of every thoughtful Christian. This even-handed, masterful defence of penal substitutionary atonement is clear and convincing. Readers will quickly grasp the theology and the urgency of the issues, and will be especially grateful for the classic objection-response format of Part Two, which makes for easy reference. A crucial read.
R. Kent Hughes, Senior Pastor Emeritus, College Church, Wheaton, Illinois
At the cross, when Jesus bore the penalty for our sins in our place, the grace of God paid the price his holiness required. This has been the message of the gospel down the ages because this is the message of the gospel as Scripture reveals it. I am deeply grateful for this book, which illumines these facts so well. It is a book faithful to Scripture, knowledgeable of history, conversant with current debate, and deeply committed to seeing the Church flourish in our day.
David F. Wells, Andrew Mutch Distinguished Professor of Historical and Systematic Theology, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Hamilton, Massachusetts
This is a very significant book. It addresses the subject of Christ’s penal substitutionary death, which lies at the heart of the biblical gospel, but which has now come under serious threat in the current theological ferment. The authors have carefully and convincingly evaluated the biblical material on which the teaching of penal substitution has been based and reaffirmed it. They have set the doctrine within the theological framework of creation, sin, redemption and relationships within the Trinity, while adducing key witnesses from two millennia of church history in support. Every major objection to penal substitution has been considered, and courteously but firmly answered. This refreshing affirmation encourages us to praise God in wonder at Christ’s atonement for us sinners. The authors have placed us in their debt. Their book deserves to be read widely.
Peter T. O’Brien, Senior Research Fellow in New Testament, Moore Theological College, Sydney
In a lucid and compelling manner the authors of Pierced for our Transgressions summon all of us as Christians to reflect carefully on how we understand and proclaim the cross of Christ. Their defence of penal substitution is a cautious reminder that, although traditional doctrines constantly need to be re-examined, we must ever be careful that we do not jettison the baby with the bathwater. Those who are repelled by provocative and unhelpful caricatures of the doctrine of penal substitution will find the present volume exceptionally helpful and informative.
T. D. Alexander, Union Theological College, Belfast



18 Comments:
Wow, that looks impressive!
Having just finished and wrteen a paper on IVP's Four Views book The Nature of the Atonement, I am very excited to see this new book out. The Four Views book was nice, but Schreiner's defense of penal substitution was necessarily short, as were his arguments against the other three positions. I hope that this book is as charitable and acknowledging of the other important aspects of the atonement, even if they are logically consequential to this one. It's already on the wish list.
A little overboard on the reviews IMO. I have a friend at a reputable university in the UK who writes a lot of books and he mentioned, after giving me one of the books he edited, that the back page blurbs were written by people who didn't even read the book and two people thought my friend had written it entirely. Welcome to the publishing world! You scratch my back ....
Old Proverb: Question stories received second hand from anonymous posters.
Justin, I can't wait to read this! Thanks for the tip!
In Christ
Noah
I have a friend at a reputable UK blog who said that people who post anonymous comments didn't read the post on which they are commenting.
It also seems to me that this is a direct attack against J.I. Packer.
Hey Anonymous, I know at least two of the people on the back cover read the book and said it is one of the best treatments they have read on the issue.
-Trey from South Hamilton
"But God forbid I should glory in anything but the Cross". Gal. 6:14
Methinks this needs to be shouted loud and clear from the mountain tops in our day and age.
And then maybe we'll see conversions like we haven't since tha Great Awakenings.
Look forward to getting a copy of this book.
This is excellent news. I am delighted that this book is being published - something sound to stand against the error that has sadly come from the UK side.
It is also encouraging to read the extent of the endorsements (which, I am sure are genuine) from different sources - reformed and charismatic. Penal substitution unites God's people in awe, wonder and gratitude as we consider the One who bore all our sins in our place.
Peter,
It is encouraging isn't !
Perhaps we have at last found the ground that can bridge the gap in the UK church... staring us in the face all along...
I pray that it is so, Dave. And we couldn't find more glorious ground to build on together!
Matt C mentioned the four views book published by IVP above. Since he mentioned it, I felt Schreiner's defense of penal substitution was quite poor. In fact, Greg Boyd gave by far the most persuasive argument in defense of the Christus Victor view as the over-arching model of atonement. While I think he's way off target on other doctrines, his Christus Victor view of atonement was fairly influential. And I'm not/wasn't a Christus Victor guy going into it either.
"Christ's death is the death of sin, and His resurrection is the raising up of righteousness. For by His death Christ has atoned for our sins, and through His resurrection He has procured His righteousness. Christ's death does not merely signify, but has effected the remission of our sins. Christ's resurrection is not merely the pledge of our righteousness, but also its cause." -Luther
"This is all my righteousness,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus." -Lowry
sounds great!
Justin,
I just recieved my copy (paid a ridiculous 20 some pounds for it, i.e. it was expensive) and just read the foreward. That alone is enough to excite me and demand more attention. My hope of course is that it isn't released next week making my 20 pounds (50$) spent seem a little over the top. I'm quite interested to see how Chalke and company respond. Has anybody seen any negative responses yet?
I've been checking out the website for this book regularly, but ordering from Amazon U.K. is not feasible for me. I can't wait until it is available in the U.S. Thanks for the information.
Dan (T&Z)
Of course authors help each other out by writing blurbs, and it may be true in some cases that they don't read the books, but I'm sure it's not in this case.
Also, those blurbs are absolutely invaluable for marketing purposes. It make a huge difference!
strangely enough, this is one of the few blogs with comments on the 4 Views book. i concur with Bruno in that Schreiner's Penal Sub presentation was rather poor, allowing Boyd and Green to pick it apart.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home