The Logical and Emotional Problems of Evil
7 comments | Permalink
Posted by Andy Naselli
This summer my church (CrossWay Community Church in Kenosha, WI) has hosted a "Difficult Issues Series" on Wednesday nights, and last night I addressed this topic: "How Could a Good God Allow Suffering and Evil? A Biblical Approach to the Logical and Emotional Problems of Evil" (MP3 | Handout PDF).
The MP3 is about 75 minutes long (and it doesn't include the Q&A that followed), and the handout is 10 pages. I am especially indebted to Drs. Carson, Feinberg, Frame, and Piper. Here's the outline:
1. Introduction
6. Recommended Resources
This summer my church (CrossWay Community Church in Kenosha, WI) has hosted a "Difficult Issues Series" on Wednesday nights, and last night I addressed this topic: "How Could a Good God Allow Suffering and Evil? A Biblical Approach to the Logical and Emotional Problems of Evil" (MP3 | Handout PDF).
The MP3 is about 75 minutes long (and it doesn't include the Q&A that followed), and the handout is 10 pages. I am especially indebted to Drs. Carson, Feinberg, Frame, and Piper. Here's the outline:
1. Introduction
- What is evil?
- What are some examples of evil that are (almost) universally outrageous?
- What is the problem of evil?
- Why must Christians address the logical and emotional problems of evil?
- What are some challenges to solving the logical and emotional problems of evil?
- Evil is not real.
- God is not all-powerful.
- This is the best possible world, and evil is necessary for its perfection.
- Evil is a result of peoples’ free will, so God is not accountable for evil.
- Evil is necessary for people to mature (i.e., build character).
- God is the indirect (not direct) cause of evil, so He is not accountable for evil.
- God is above the law, so He can do what seems evil to other people.
- Non-Christians have no right to question whether God is both all-powerful and all-good.
- Bad things do not happen to good people; good and bad things happen to bad people.
- The problem of evil is an argument for God, not against Him.
- God is not obligated to explain the problem of evil to anyone.
- God (not our sense of justice) is the standard for what He does.
- God ordains and causes evil, but He cannot be blamed for it.
- The logical problem of evil (including providence) involves mystery, requiring that Christians maintain doctrinal tensions in biblical proportion.
- God uses evil for a greater good.
- There was no problem of evil before the fall, nor will there be one in the eternal state.
- God uses natural evil to illustrate how bad moral evil really is, and the right response is repentance.
- The most significant problem of evil is the cross.
- People who are suffering typically are wrestling primarily with the emotional problem of evil (not the logical one).
- Understand how people initially react to suffering.
- You shouldn’t say certain things to people who are suffering.
- You should do certain things to people who are suffering.
6. Recommended Resources
- Books [23 resources]
- MP3s [8 resources]



7 Comments:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the terrific handout!!!
FWIW, I like Professor Peter Kreeft's book on suffering and evil which I read many years ago. I can't remember the exact title of it, but Kreeft did an excellent job of pointing his readers to the Cross as God's "answer" to the logical and emotional problems of evil.
Hehe...
Didn't have time to listen to the audio though, no speakers :-( but here's a quick comment:
"This is the best possible world, and evil is necessary for its perfection."
Piper seems to argue this way, cf. here.
I wonder if that puts Frame and Piper at odds on this issue?
I will note that the argument critiqued here:
"This is the best possible world, and evil is necessary for its perfection."
Is more specific way of stating (or is a form of) the argument affirmed here:
"God uses evil for a greater good."
Just a little funny, on the face of it, to see the two beside each other like that... since the former is a teleological greater good defence, which is the definition given in the latter.
The Peter Kreeft book to which TUAD referred, Making Sense Out of Suffering, is definitely helpful in some ways. It does point the reader to God and the Cross in the midst of pain and evil. However, given that Professor Kreeft is a Catholic, by definition, his book cannot give the Biblical comfort of God's absolute sovereignty over (and in) suffering, sin, human fallibility, and natural disasters.
For the comfort of God's sovereignty over these things (and everything else), the best book, outside of the Bible itself (!), that I have found is When God Weeps, written by Joni Eareckson Tada and Steve Estes (a Westminster Seminary grad). The book is recommended by both David Powlison and Paul Tripp and is available at wtsbooks.com. It was *hugely* helpful to me in coming to a Biblical understanding of God's sovereignty over, and in, *all* things!
Thanks Justin for posting this. In God's Providence, I pulled up the post, two minutes later, my friend and co-worker gathered the office together to let us know that our friend and co-laborer in ministry received news yesterday that his heart is failing. I may not share this information with him or his wife right now. They are extremely emotional right now, so I hope to remind of the Gospel and serve them. Thanks again!
So, dude... you go to a church named after a publishing company?
Uh, cool!
I imagine the book table has some killer deals!
Andy, that was one of the best presentations on the problem of evil I have heard. Well done!
My former roommate Drew writes on the problem of evil occasionally, you can see his latest post on the intuitive problem here:
http://beginningwisdom.blogspot.com/2008/08/problem-of-evil-part-2.html
Peace and God bless!
The handout download link seems to be broken for me - would it be possible to fix it, I'd be interested in looking at it.
Thanks.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home