I keep seeing reviewers bemoan Stein's relation of Darwinism to Nazi Germany as unfair or "beside the point".
I believe Carter said we need to evaluate Darwinism "on its merits and not on the possible outcomes".
I understand this, but I disagree. I think theories should be evaluated on their plausible (and historical) outcomes. We should also evaluate the evidence for said theory. . . . .but I would say that the History of applying the theory is fairly good "evidence".
Now, one can find unpleasant histories in any strain of thought (i.e., . . the crusades/Christianity). But, there doesn't seem to be an "upside" example from Darwinism. We have to go with what we've seen (Nazism). In Christianity, Islam, Freudianism, or Kantism, for example,. . you could conceivably counteract the negative historical examples with positive ones. I"m not sure the same could be done with Darwinism.
I agree with you. Racism in general was given a hefty boost through Darwinism - so was abortion, infanticide, suicide and a host of other social ills- the basic devaluing of mankind. These are the UNAVOIDABLE result of thinking that man is simply an overgrown ape, evolved to greater and lesser degrees.
As much as I agree that Darwinian theory influenced Nazism, I think it unwise to give such a monolithic explanation for its rise and especially for the Holocaust. We must come to terms with the fact that the long standing strain of anti-semitism in the Church had an influence as well, both Catholic and Protestant. It is this same anti-semitic spirit that I believe gave rise to Replacement theology and the denegration of Israel in the Church's doctrine.
3 Comments:
I keep seeing reviewers bemoan Stein's relation of Darwinism to Nazi Germany as unfair or "beside the point".
I believe Carter said we need to evaluate Darwinism "on its merits and not on the possible outcomes".
I understand this, but I disagree. I think theories should be evaluated on their plausible (and historical) outcomes. We should also evaluate the evidence for said theory. . . . .but I would say that the History of applying the theory is fairly good "evidence".
Now, one can find unpleasant histories in any strain of thought (i.e., . . the crusades/Christianity). But, there doesn't seem to be an "upside" example from Darwinism. We have to go with what we've seen (Nazism). In Christianity, Islam, Freudianism, or Kantism, for example,. . you could conceivably counteract the negative historical examples with positive ones. I"m not sure the same could be done with Darwinism.
Aaron
Aaron,
I agree with you. Racism in general was given a hefty boost through Darwinism - so was abortion, infanticide, suicide and a host of other social ills- the basic devaluing of mankind. These are the UNAVOIDABLE result of thinking that man is simply an overgrown ape, evolved to greater and lesser degrees.
As much as I agree that Darwinian theory influenced Nazism, I think it unwise to give such a monolithic explanation for its rise and especially for the Holocaust. We must come to terms with the fact that the long standing strain of anti-semitism in the Church had an influence as well, both Catholic and Protestant. It is this same anti-semitic spirit that I believe gave rise to Replacement theology and the denegration of Israel in the Church's doctrine.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home